What is an overperforming score?
An overperforming score shows how much better a post is doing than that account's typical post. SocialWire calls it ×normal: a post at 6× normal has six times the interactions that account usually gets.
Updated October 2026
To confirm How "typical post" is calculated (which recent posts count, and whether it's an average or a median) needs to be confirmed with the product team before publishing.
A worked example
| Account | Typical post | This post | ×normal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Valley Gazette (18K followers) | 29 | 412 | 14.2× |
| Rep. Dana Whitfield (64K followers) | 227 | 2,180 | 9.6× |
| National News Network (9.1M followers) | 6,800 | 7,500 | 1.1× |
By raw interactions the national outlet is first. By ×normal it's last, because 7,500 is an ordinary night for an account that size. The local paper's post is the real outlier. Sample accounts.
How to read the score
- Around 1×: an ordinary post for that account.
- Above 3×: unusual. Worth a look.
- Above 10×: something is happening.
These are rules of thumb, not hard cutoffs. A quiet account can jump to a high score on a modest number of interactions, so check the raw count too.
Why not just sort by likes?
Sorting by likes always puts the biggest accounts on top, so a list that mixes local pages and national outlets turns into a list of national outlets. Engagement rate (interactions divided by followers) helps a little, but it ignores how each audience actually behaves. Comparing each post with its own account's history answers the question an editor actually has: is this unusual?
Is this the same as CrowdTangle's overperforming score?
It's the same idea. CrowdTangle compared a post with what that account usually got, and SocialWire does too. SocialWire applies it across Facebook, Instagram, X, Threads, YouTube and Bluesky in a single list.
Find the story before it trends.
14-day free trial. Plans from $99 a month. See pricing →